I'm an actual admirer in the H4831 powder. I get terrific velocity and accuracy outside of any caliber I've tried it in. From the twenty five-06 up towards the 338 it really is my go to powder of option. I attempt every type of powders when Functioning up loads, even so the H4831 generally appears to arrive out on best for accuracy and velocity when the situation is in the 06 class or bigger.
Of course, the Hodgdon tech would not endorse my mixing of different ton numbers, but I feel I realize why. It's a litigation-driven environment, plus some idiot would definitely deduce that he could blend H380 and H110 and come up with his possess tailor made mixture of powder. What a world.
4gr of H4831sc and Federal 215 primers. I discovered this combo creates .5MOA teams with velocity about 3020fps away from a 26" barrel. I use this same powder in my 300wm capturing 180gr capsules, so It truly is great to have just one powder for the two.
Minnesota H4831SC is my visit while in the 7mm Rem Mag, but I am preserving the little I have still left for slide 2021. I might start off low and perform your way up, determined by what load data you take a look at for this combo the min/max loads are all around the board.
The sole change as I are aware of it is that the SC was meant to get the job done by means of powder steps much better (which it does). The for a longer period grains usually do not feed perfectly in the slightest degree in some measures. Thats my 02 :grin:
Any load data to assist that? My initial considered is it's not about to burn every one of the way and velocities will be gradual and in all places. Is likely to be a nice fireworks Screen!
Nampa, Idaho In my experience the only genuine variance would be that the shortcut meters superior through reloading equipment. The moment It can be loaded theres no useful variance. I've read h4831 vs h4831sc that the shortcut can have a very small bit quicker melt away fee but It appears insignificant.
Anyhow, I planned to give some 7828SC a attempt to reduce a number of the compression. What a h4831sc load data miscalculation, I couldn't get this powder to shoot correctly or produce the velocities I get with regular 7828.
The main reason I switched from IMR 4831 to H4831 was to benefit from the temperature insensitivity of the Hodgdon extreme powder.
Liberalism; The impossible nevertheless recognized Idea that it's fully probable to pick up a turd because of the cleanse finish.
Operate your load up with the precise powder (sc or common) and whole lot you happen to be employing although. h4831sc Same melt away amount does not imply it is going to behave "specifically" the exact same. I've viewed above a hundred fps distinction between sc and mil-surp a great deal of H4831.
It's been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to try. Observed a node and shot some teams. I shot a .6 five shot group currently. It's just a little slower than H1000, but shoots excellent. Thanks for the advice, It is great to know that I have bought selections when just one or the opposite powder is dried up.
rayporter explained: i never observed a variation in addition to the regular is like rolling cordwood on to the the pan. Simply click to expand...
If I have a pound or two of a powder and get far more of a similar, only another lot quantity, I will mix them all up so that I have a homogeneous batch of powder with which to operate.